-
A Great Lakes coalition is giving out $35,000 in grants to communities impacted by contamination from the toxic "forever chemicals" known as PFAS.
-
“A department cannot skirt this statutory requirement during Rulemaking A by promising to address the costs later in Rulemaking B, but then when later comes, ignoring the costs in Rulemaking B because the criteria were already set in Rulemaking A,” Judge Brock Swartzle wrote in his opinion.
-
The Air Force has announced plans to expand its PFAS cleanup in Oscoda to stop contaminated water from bleeding into the community.
-
The systems will be installed with the intent of reducing the spread of an underground PFAS plume from reaching the nearby Van Etten Lake.
-
Veterans currently do not receive disability benefits for health conditions associated with PFAS exposure, but some veterans are taking up the against PFAS manufacturers like 3M.
-
Health officials are once again warning people to avoid foam on Michigan waterbodies, which may contain toxic “forever chemicals.”
-
Famers from four states met yesterday to share how their livelihoods were essentially ruined by PFAS contamination. They called on polluters to reimburse them for their losses and the government to step up PFAS regulation.
-
It’s not uncommon to see news stories that say, “toxic forever chemicals discovered” in insert-consumer-product, but why do PFAS need to be discovered? What alternatives do we have, and what are the prospects for banning them?
-
Chemical contaminants in fish aren’t new. Mercury, PCBs, dioxins and DDT may be some familiar household names for fish-lovers. But the forever chemicals, PFAS, in fish are drawing more attention, as new research highlights their toxicity.
-
State officials and Oscoda residents are again clashing with the Air Force over cleanup regulations at the former Wurtsmith Air Force Base.